The internet is filled with information, and none of it is completely reliable. While recognizing unreliable sources in certain online areas is easy, assessing the accuracy of information can be challenging. Here are three frameworks to help determine the trustworthiness of online content:
These questions are common in previous frameworks:
Using the frameworks, test them out on the following topics. Use a search engine, not an LLM, to find content about these topics, and try a different framework on one source for each:
Before we decide if AI is "stealing," we need to understand the history of piracy and how we judge if a source is telling us the truth.
Framework Recommendations Don't get overwhelmed by the different frameworks! Use them like tools in a toolbox:
For a quick scan: Use the 5Ws (Who, What, When, Where, Why) to see if a site is even worth your time.
For a deep dive: Use the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) on the one source you plan to use as your main evidence in your video.
The Topics Research the following using a search engine (like Google or DuckDuckGo), and apply your chosen framework to one good source and one bad source for each:
Copyright & Napster: What happened when music went digital in the early 2000s? How does that relate to AI today?
The Hollywood Strike: Why were writers and actors in 2023 worried about AI using their likeness or their scripts?
Canadian vs. American Law: Is there a difference in how our neighbours to the south handle "Fair Use" compared to our "Fair Dealing" here in Ontario?
Now, you’re going to create a video giving your opinion on the ethics of AI. Instead of a boring slideshow, try to use Canva to pull off some "Influencer Moves."
Choose Your "Influencer Move" Pick at least one of these styles to make your video pop:
The "React" Split-Screen: Use a split-screen layout. Put your face on one side and the website or artwork you are discussing on the other.
The "Green Screen" Effect: Use Canva’s Background Remover (under "Edit Video") to cut yourself out and place yourself right "inside" a news article or a digital gallery.
The "Point & Pop": Film yourself pointing to empty space. In Canva, add Text Bubbles or Stickers that "pop" into those spots using the "Animate" tool.
Script Your "Two-Sided" Argument To show you've really thought this through, your script should follow this structure:
Export and Submit When you are finished in Canva, click Share > Download > MP4 to save your masterpiece. Upload both your analysis video and your "Is AI Stealing?" video to Google Classroom.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
Source analysis comparison (Screencast)
"Is AI Stealing?" Opinion video (Influencer-style)
We are learning to:
Demonstrate an understanding of media texts and how media conventions influence meaning
Create media texts for specific purposes and audiences using appropriate forms and techniques
Reflect on the effectiveness of research and media-creation strategies
Use speaking skills and strategies to communicate ideas clearly and persuasively
I can:
Summarize the history of copyright and compare how different eras (Napster vs. AI) handle piracy
Use evaluation frameworks (like the 5Ws or CRAAP) to determine the credibility of online sources
Use Canva's video tools (like split-screen or overlays) to mimic professional influencer styles
Present a balanced, two-sided argument that considers both creators and technology developers
Reflect on my prompting and video-editing process to identify what worked and what I would change
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge/Understanding
How well does the student demonstrate an understanding of copyright history and source evaluation?
|
Thoroughly explains copyright concepts and accurately applies frameworks to distinguish between sources | Explains copyright concepts clearly and applies frameworks to evaluate sources | Explains copyright concepts with some detail; source evaluation is present but may be simple | Demonstrates limited understanding of copyright or source evaluation frameworks |
|
Thinking/Inquiring
How effectively does the student analyze media techniques and structure a balanced argument?
|
Provides a sophisticated, two-sided analysis that deeply considers both creator and developer perspectives | Provides a clear, two-sided argument that considers different perspectives on the AI debate | Provides an argument that touches on different perspectives but may favor one side too heavily | Provides a one-sided or underdeveloped argument without considering multiple perspectives |
|
Application
How skillfully does the student use Canva and "influencer moves" to create their videos?
|
Skillfully integrates advanced Canva features (like background removal or split-screen) to create a professional look | Uses Canva features effectively to create an organized video that mimics influencer styles | Uses Canva features to create a basic video; influencer "moves" may be inconsistent or simple | Uses Canva features with limited success; video is unorganized or lacks visual polish |
|
Communication
How clearly and persuasively does the student speak and present their ideas?
|
Communicates with exceptional clarity, using professional tone, pacing, and visual cues to engage the audience | Communicates ideas clearly and uses appropriate tone and pacing for the intended audience | Communicates with some clarity; tone or pacing may be inconsistent at times | Communicates with limited clarity; the message or opinion is difficult for the audience to follow |
Thoroughly explains copyright concepts and accurately applies frameworks to distinguish between sources
Explains copyright concepts clearly and applies frameworks to evaluate sources
Explains copyright concepts with some detail; source evaluation is present but may be simple
Demonstrates limited understanding of copyright or source evaluation frameworks
Provides a sophisticated, two-sided analysis that deeply considers both creator and developer perspectives
Provides a clear, two-sided argument that considers different perspectives on the AI debate
Provides an argument that touches on different perspectives but may favor one side too heavily
Provides a one-sided or underdeveloped argument without considering multiple perspectives
Skillfully integrates advanced Canva features (like background removal or split-screen) to create a professional look
Uses Canva features effectively to create an organized video that mimics influencer styles
Uses Canva features to create a basic video; influencer "moves" may be inconsistent or simple
Uses Canva features with limited success; video is unorganized or lacks visual polish
Communicates with exceptional clarity, using professional tone, pacing, and visual cues to engage the audience
Communicates ideas clearly and uses appropriate tone and pacing for the intended audience
Communicates with some clarity; tone or pacing may be inconsistent at times
Communicates with limited clarity; the message or opinion is difficult for the audience to follow