In academic research, the sources you use to support your arguments are categorized into three levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Knowing the difference between these types of sources helps you choose the best evidence for your assignments, evaluate the reliability of your information, and understand how to cite them correctly.
The classification of a source depends on how close the creator of the source was to the event or data they are describing.
A primary source is direct, first-hand evidence or an original record of an event, object, person, or work of art. Primary sources are created during the time period under study, or by someone who directly experienced or witnessed the events. They contain raw, unfiltered information.
Use primary sources when you want to analyze original theories or data, draw your own conclusions about a historical event, or perform close readings of creative works.
A secondary source interprets, analyzes, evaluates, or discusses primary sources. These sources are created after the fact by someone who did not personally witness or participate in the events or research. They analyze primary evidence to construct an argument, identify patterns, or provide historical context.
Use secondary sources to get background context, see what expert scholars have written about your topic, and support your arguments with established research and analysis.
A tertiary source indexes, digests, compiles, or summarizes information from primary and secondary sources. They do not contain original research or unique analysis. Instead, they provide a high-level overview of a topic.
Use tertiary sources at the very beginning of your research to get a broad overview of your topic, identify key terms and figures, and find references to primary and secondary sources.
The Wikipedia Rule: Do not cite Wikipedia (a tertiary source) in your final assignments. Instead, scroll to the bottom of the Wikipedia page and look at the "References" or "External Links" sections. Use those links to find the primary and secondary sources that Wikipedia used, read them yourself, and cite those instead.
| Feature | Primary Sources | Secondary Sources | Tertiary Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Direct, original evidence or first-hand records. | Analysis, interpretation, or evaluation of primary evidence. | Summaries, compilations, or indexes of other sources. |
| Creator's Role | Witness, researcher, or creator of the work. | Researcher analyzing someone else's work or events. | Compiler organizing existing information. |
| Key Questions to Ask | Does this represent original data, a first-hand account, or the creative work itself? | Does this analyze, critique, or summarize primary evidence to build an argument? | Is this a broad collection or summary of facts with no new analysis? |
| Academic Value | High (provides direct evidence). | High (provides context, analysis, and expert debate). | Low for citations (best used for background reading and finding sources). |
The boundary between source types is not always rigid. The exact same document can be primary, secondary, or tertiary depending on how you are using it in your research.
If you are struggling to classify a source, ask yourself these three questions: