"There is no such thing as a life that is simple or a life that is unconstructed. The moment a life is written, it becomes a story."
Adapted from Hermione Lee (Biographer and Academic)Welcome to the Biography Unit! For the next few weeks, you will be reading a full-length biography or autobiography of a person of interest.
But before you settle on one, you need to shop around. Instead of just picking the first book you find, you are going to step into the role of a literary critic. You will investigate five different biography options, create a custom rating system, and produce a series of short-form, social-media style video reviews for each.
While you can choose subjects from anywhere in the world, we strongly encourage you to include Canadian figures in your search. Exploring a Canadian life offers a unique opportunity to engage with local history, cultural diversity, and the complex narratives that shape our national identity.
Here are a few compelling Canadian subjects and books to consider adding to your list of options:
Have other subjects in mind? Look into biographies of Canadian authors, politicians, activists, athletes, or international figures who fascinate you. You're not limited to this list: Feel free to explore and choose someone you connect with!
Your task is to preview 5 different biography/autobiography options and evaluate them using a rating system of your own creation. Use online reviews, YouTube/Social Media reviews, or Gemini suggetions to get a sense of what some books would be like.
You must define your own criteria for what makes a biography "good" or "suitable" for an Ontario Grade 12 student. You will rate books on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, but you get to make up your own values and explain what those scores represent.
Think about the "strategic" aspects of the writing. Don't just focus on whether the subject is famous. Think about how the book is constructed:
Choose the book with the highest score. You may need to revise your scoring system to rig the results: A small gimmick to engage people in the videos you will make in the next step is ok, but generally try to demonstrate that you're engaging seriously with the content.
Deliverable:
Make a Google Doc assigning scores from 1-5 to each category for each book. You will submit a markdown file, so don't use tables or anything fancy: just write a heading for each book and the category and score on new lines. Based on your system, select a winner.
For each of the 5 books you investigate, record a short, social-media style video review. Imagine you are posting this to TikTok, Instagram Reels, or YouTube Shorts.
Deliverables:
Submit all of your reviews (about 1 minute each/5 mins total) as one video file. Remember to continue to include technical stretch goals in your video productions.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
Score Card (Google Doc)
Five Social Media Reviews (video)
We are learning to:
Create a custom evaluation framework to analyze and rate literary biographies
Evaluate five different biography or autobiography options using your custom criteria, focusing on their suitability for an Ontario student
Analyze the "meta" writing of each text—how the author selects details, frames the subject, and constructs a narrative out of a life
Communicate concise, engaging critical reviews using short-form digital media conventions
I can:
Define a unique value system with clear criteria for rating books from 1 to 5 stars
Select and research 5 different biography or autobiography options, including at least one Canadian suggestion
Create 5 social-media style videos (under 1 minute each) that hook the audience, evaluate the text, and give a 1-5 star rating
Incorporate "meta" observations in each review (e.g., author's relationship to the subject, narrative voice, selectivity, and bias)
Justify your final selection of the book you will read based on your evaluation results
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge / Understanding
How well does the student demonstrate understanding of biography/autobiography conventions and how they apply to suitability for a target student audience?
|
Demonstrates a thorough and nuanced understanding of biography conventions and student suitability | Demonstrates a considerable understanding of biography conventions and student suitability | Demonstrates some understanding of biography conventions and student suitability | Demonstrates limited understanding of biography conventions and student suitability |
|
Thinking / Inquiry
How effectively does the student design a custom rating framework (value system) and integrate critical "meta" thinking about authorial choices and narrative construction in their reviews?
|
Formulates a highly sophisticated, original value system and performs deep, insightful "meta" analysis of the texts | Formulates a clear value system and performs detailed "meta" analysis of the texts | Formulates a basic value system and performs some "meta" analysis of the texts | Formulates a weak or unclear value system and performs limited "meta" analysis |
|
Communication
How clearly, dynamically, and engagingly does the student present their reviews across five short social-media style videos (1 minute or less each)?
|
Delivers highly engaging, polished, and concise video reviews with exceptional pacing and clarity | Delivers clear and engaging video reviews with good pacing and clarity | Delivers video reviews with some engagement, clarity, or organization | Delivers video reviews with limited clarity, poor pacing, or minimal engagement |
|
Application
How effectively does the student apply their custom rating criteria consistently across 5 different biography/autobiography options to select a final text?
|
Applies the rating criteria with a high degree of consistency and effectiveness across all 5 options | Applies the rating criteria with considerable consistency and effectiveness across most options | Applies the rating criteria with some consistency across the options | Applies the rating criteria with limited consistency |
Demonstrates a thorough and nuanced understanding of biography conventions and student suitability
Demonstrates a considerable understanding of biography conventions and student suitability
Demonstrates some understanding of biography conventions and student suitability
Demonstrates limited understanding of biography conventions and student suitability
Formulates a highly sophisticated, original value system and performs deep, insightful "meta" analysis of the texts
Formulates a clear value system and performs detailed "meta" analysis of the texts
Formulates a basic value system and performs some "meta" analysis of the texts
Formulates a weak or unclear value system and performs limited "meta" analysis
Delivers highly engaging, polished, and concise video reviews with exceptional pacing and clarity
Delivers clear and engaging video reviews with good pacing and clarity
Delivers video reviews with some engagement, clarity, or organization
Delivers video reviews with limited clarity, poor pacing, or minimal engagement
Applies the rating criteria with a high degree of consistency and effectiveness across all 5 options
Applies the rating criteria with considerable consistency and effectiveness across most options
Applies the rating criteria with some consistency across the options
Applies the rating criteria with limited consistency