The internet is filled with information, but not all of it is reliable. While recognizing unreliable sources in certain online areas is easy, assessing the accuracy of information can be challenging. Here are three frameworks to help determine the trustworthiness of online content:
These questions are common in previous frameworks:
Using the frameworks, test them out on the following topics. Use a search engine, not an LLM, to find content about these topics, and try a different framework on one source for each:
Before we decide if AI is "stealing," we need to understand the history of piracy and how we judge if a source is telling us the truth.
Framework Recommendations Don't get overwhelmed by the different frameworks! Use them like tools in a toolbox:
For a quick scan: Use the 5Ws (Who, What, When, Where, Why) to see if a site is even worth your time.
For a deep dive: Use the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) on the one source you plan to use as your main evidence in your video.
The Topics Research the following using a search engine (like Google or DuckDuckGo), and apply your chosen framework to one good source and one bad source for each:
Copyright & Napster: What happened when music went digital in the early 2000s? How does that relate to AI today?
The Hollywood Strike: Why were writers and actors in 2023 worried about AI using their likeness or their scripts?
Canadian vs. American Law: Is there a difference in how our neighbours to the south handle "Fair Use" compared to our "Fair Dealing" here in Ontario?
Now, you’re going to create a video giving your opinion on the ethics of AI. Instead of a boring slideshow, try to use Canva to pull off some "Influencer Moves."
Choose Your "Influencer Move" Pick at least one of these styles to make your video pop:
The "React" Split-Screen: Use a split-screen layout. Put your face on one side and the website or artwork you are discussing on the other.
The "Green Screen" Effect: Use Canva’s Background Remover (under "Edit Video") to cut yourself out and place yourself right "inside" a news article or a digital gallery.
The "Point & Pop": Film yourself pointing to empty space. In Canva, add Text Bubbles or Stickers that "pop" into those spots using the "Animate" tool.
Script Your "Two-Sided" Argument To show you've really thought this through, your script should follow this structure:
Export and Submit When you are finished in Canva, click Share > Download > MP4 to save your masterpiece. Upload both your analysis video and your "Is AI Stealing?" video to Google Classroom.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
Strategy comparison/analysis video
Is AI Stealing? video
We are learning to:
Critically evaluate online sources for credibility, purpose, and potential bias
Create persuasive media using styles and techniques designed to influence an audience
Use revision strategies to ensure a clear, impactful message
I can:
Analyze sources effectively using frameworks like CRAAP, RADCAB, or the 5Ws.
Create a video imitating an influencer with conventions and techniques suitable for the message.
Revise and polish work using feedback or AI for a high-quality product.
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge/Understanding
How well does the student demonstrate an understanding of copyright, piracy, and AI development through research and media analysis?
|
Demonstrates a thorough and insightful understanding of copyright history, Canadian vs. American law, and the technical development of AI. | Demonstrates a clear understanding of copyright history, legal differences, and AI development. | Demonstrates a basic understanding of copyright and AI, though some details or historical context may be missing. | Demonstrates limited understanding of copyright, piracy, or how AI models are developed. |
|
Thinking/Inquiring
How effectively does the student apply source-evaluation frameworks (CRAAP, 5Ws) to analyze and compare the credibility of online sources?
|
Applies evaluation frameworks with high critical thinking to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality sources with sophisticated reasoning. | Applies evaluation frameworks effectively to distinguish between sources and provides clear reasoning for their choices. | Applies evaluation frameworks with some effectiveness; reasoning for source credibility is provided but may be general. | Applies evaluation frameworks with limited effectiveness; struggles to distinguish between credible and non-credible sources. |
|
Application
How skillfully does the student use video production techniques (imitation of influencers, screencasting) to communicate their analysis and opinions?
|
Skillfully uses professional screencasting and stylistic elements from influencers to create a highly engaging and polished media product. | Uses screencasting and stylistic elements effectively to create an organized and clear media product. | Uses media techniques with some success, though the video may lack polish or consistent stylistic choices. | Uses media techniques with limited success; the video is difficult to follow or lacks clear structure. |
|
Communication
How clearly and persuasively does the student express their opinion on the ethics of AI and the effectiveness of evaluation strategies?
|
Communicates a highly persuasive and nuanced opinion with exceptional clarity; uses a voice and tone perfectly suited for the intended audience. | Communicates a clear and well-supported opinion; uses an appropriate voice and tone for the audience. | Communicates an opinion with some clarity; reasoning may be simple or the tone may be inconsistent. | Communicates an opinion with limited clarity or support; the message is difficult to determine. |
Demonstrates a thorough and insightful understanding of copyright history, Canadian vs. American law, and the technical development of AI.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of copyright history, legal differences, and AI development.
Demonstrates a basic understanding of copyright and AI, though some details or historical context may be missing.
Demonstrates limited understanding of copyright, piracy, or how AI models are developed.
Applies evaluation frameworks with high critical thinking to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality sources with sophisticated reasoning.
Applies evaluation frameworks effectively to distinguish between sources and provides clear reasoning for their choices.
Applies evaluation frameworks with some effectiveness; reasoning for source credibility is provided but may be general.
Applies evaluation frameworks with limited effectiveness; struggles to distinguish between credible and non-credible sources.
Skillfully uses professional screencasting and stylistic elements from influencers to create a highly engaging and polished media product.
Uses screencasting and stylistic elements effectively to create an organized and clear media product.
Uses media techniques with some success, though the video may lack polish or consistent stylistic choices.
Uses media techniques with limited success; the video is difficult to follow or lacks clear structure.
Communicates a highly persuasive and nuanced opinion with exceptional clarity; uses a voice and tone perfectly suited for the intended audience.
Communicates a clear and well-supported opinion; uses an appropriate voice and tone for the audience.
Communicates an opinion with some clarity; reasoning may be simple or the tone may be inconsistent.
Communicates an opinion with limited clarity or support; the message is difficult to determine.