In this assignment, you will explore how Indigenous voices are represented and shared through modern media. You will examine the work of Indigenous creators (First Nations, Métis, and/or Inuit) who use platforms such as social media, video, music, podcasts, or interviews to tell stories, share knowledge, and communicate ideas.
You will compare two Indigenous creators, looking at:
This assignment is an introduction to Indigenous-created texts that you will return to throughout the course as we study a wider variety of sources and forms of storytelling.
As you work, think about:
Indigenous Storywork is a way of understanding texts that centers relationships, responsibility, and respect. Stories are not just sources of information or entertainment; they carry teachings, values, and ways of knowing that connect people to land, community, history, and one another. When engaging with Indigenous-created media, Storywork asks you to consider why a story is being shared, who it is for, and what responsibilities come with listening to it.
Storywork also recognizes that stories are shaped by lived experience and context. Indigenous creators often draw on intergenerational knowledge, cultural memory, and responses to historical and ongoing colonial realities. Rather than separating “past” and “present,” Storywork encourages you to see how history, culture, and current socio-political conditions are woven together in modern media, even in short-form or informal platforms like social media.
Using an Indigenous Storywork lens means slowing down and listening carefully. Instead of judging or debating, you focus on understanding relationships, perspectives, and intentions. In this assignment, you are not expected to speak for Indigenous peoples or evaluate their experiences. Your role is to observe, analyze, and reflect respectfully, recognizing that listening itself is an important and active form of learning.
You will use an Indigenous Storywork lens to guide your thinking. This means paying attention to relationships, responsibility, respect, and context, rather than just summarizing content. The goal is to understand how stories function and why they are shared.
When engaging with Indigenous voices online, it is important to be aware of performative engagement. Performative engagement happens when someone responds to Indigenous content mainly to appear supportive, informed, or “on the right side,” rather than to genuinely listen, learn, or build understanding. This can include leaving generic praise, repeating slogans without understanding their meaning, or centering one’s own feelings instead of the message being shared. Even when intentions are positive, performative responses can shift attention away from Indigenous voices and experiences.
Tokenism is closely related and occurs when Indigenous people or perspectives are included in a limited, simplified, or symbolic way rather than being engaged with thoughtfully and respectfully. This might look like focusing on a single Indigenous creator as if they represent all Indigenous peoples, or engaging with Indigenous content only during certain moments while ignoring the broader diversity of Nations, perspectives, and experiences. Tokenism reduces complex identities and stories into something easily consumable, rather than something that deserves sustained attention and respect.
In this assignment, you are encouraged to think carefully about when to speak and when to listen. Respectful digital citizenship sometimes means choosing not to comment at all and instead reflecting privately on what you have learned. Genuine engagement prioritizes understanding, accountability, and humility. Recognizing performative engagement and tokenism helps ensure that your interactions support Indigenous voices rather than unintentionally diminishing or oversimplifying them.
Part of this assignment is learning how to engage safely and respectfully online. You will reflect on when it is appropriate to comment, when it is better to listen, and how to avoid harm or performative engagement.
Indigenous creators are shaping conversations in media right now. Learning to listen carefully, analyze thoughtfully, and respond respectfully builds skills you will use throughout this course.
You will revisit the creators and ideas from this assignment in later units as we deepen our analysis of texts, storytelling, and communication.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
A comparison chart (Creator Snapshot Log) for two creators
A short script/outline for your comparison
A 60–90s comparison video OR a 400–600 word comparison post (student choice)
A 45–60s reflection video on respectful online engagement and learning
We are learning to:
Communicate and collaborate online in a safe, respectful, responsible, and inclusive way while demonstrating cultural awareness with Indigenous communities
Analyze themes in First Nations, Métis, and Inuit cultures that reflect varied identities, perspectives, relationships, legacies, truths, and ways of knowing, being, and doing
Reference a variety of text forms by diverse First Nations, Métis, and Inuit creators
Compare influences of historical periods, cultural experiences, and/or socio-political conditions on Indigenous-created texts and connect them to current lived experiences
I can:
Demonstrate safe, respectful, and responsible participation when engaging with Indigenous creators and content online.
Identify and explain key themes in Indigenous-created media that reflect diverse identities, perspectives, and ways of knowing.
Use and interpret a range of text forms by First Nations, Métis, and Inuit creators to make meaning using an Indigenous Storywork approach.
Compare how historical, cultural, and/or socio-political contexts influence Indigenous-created texts and connect those influences to current lived experiences.
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge / Understanding
How well does the student identify themes and purposes in Indigenous-created media texts?
|
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of themes and purposes across texts | Demonstrates a clear understanding of themes and purposes across texts | Demonstrates a partial understanding of themes and purposes across texts | Demonstrates a limited understanding of themes and purposes across texts |
|
Thinking / Inquiry
How effectively does the student analyze Indigenous-created texts using an Indigenous Storywork lens?
|
Very effectively analyzes texts, showing deep insight into relationships, perspectives, and ways of knowing | Effectively analyzes texts, showing clear understanding of relationships and perspectives | Somewhat effectively analyzes texts, with limited depth or clarity | Analyzes texts with minimal effectiveness or understanding |
|
Thinking / Inquiry
How effectively does the student compare historical, cultural, or socio-political influences across texts?
|
Very effectively compares influences and clearly connects them to current lived experiences | Effectively compares influences and connects them to current lived experiences | Partially compares influences with limited connection to current lived experiences | Shows minimal comparison of influences or connection to current lived experiences |
|
Communication
How effectively does the student communicate ideas in a respectful, responsible, and culturally aware manner?
|
Communicates ideas very effectively with a high level of respect and cultural awareness | Communicates ideas effectively with clear respect and cultural awareness | Communicates ideas with some respect and cultural awareness | Communicates ideas with limited respect or cultural awareness |
|
Application
How effectively does the student apply responsible digital citizenship when engaging with Indigenous media?
|
Consistently applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices | Usually applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices | Sometimes applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices | Rarely applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices |
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of themes and purposes across texts
Demonstrates a clear understanding of themes and purposes across texts
Demonstrates a partial understanding of themes and purposes across texts
Demonstrates a limited understanding of themes and purposes across texts
Very effectively analyzes texts, showing deep insight into relationships, perspectives, and ways of knowing
Effectively analyzes texts, showing clear understanding of relationships and perspectives
Somewhat effectively analyzes texts, with limited depth or clarity
Analyzes texts with minimal effectiveness or understanding
Very effectively compares influences and clearly connects them to current lived experiences
Effectively compares influences and connects them to current lived experiences
Partially compares influences with limited connection to current lived experiences
Shows minimal comparison of influences or connection to current lived experiences
Communicates ideas very effectively with a high level of respect and cultural awareness
Communicates ideas effectively with clear respect and cultural awareness
Communicates ideas with some respect and cultural awareness
Communicates ideas with limited respect or cultural awareness
Consistently applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices
Usually applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices
Sometimes applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices
Rarely applies safe, respectful, and responsible digital practices