The goal of this assignment isn’t just to check if you did the reading: it’s to help you practice synthesis. Instead of just finding a fact and copying it down, you are being asked to look at your research and create a "puzzle" for your classmates. By building these questions, you demonstrate that you truly understand how different historical events or ideas connect to one another.
You are responsible for submitting one high-quality multiple-choice question for every two media logs you submit (so 22 per unit).
Thinking and Inquiring: Guiding Your Own Research The primary goal of this assignment is to help you move away from passive reading and toward active inquiry. Instead of simply absorbing facts as they appear in your research, you are learning to use questions as a compass. By formulating a high-quality question, you are essentially identifying the "core" of a historical problem. This skill ensures that your research remains focused and purposeful, helping you identify exactly what evidence you need to find to prove a specific point or understand a complex event.
Application (Analysis): Evaluating Evidence History is rarely about a single "correct" fact; it is about how we interpret a collection of evidence. Through this project, you will practice breaking down complex historical data to determine which details are the most significant. When you analyze evidence effectively, you aren't just summarizing what happened: you are looking at the mechanics of history. You are investigating how specific social, political, or economic factors influenced an outcome, which allows you to create more sophisticated quiz questions.
Application (Synthesis): Making Connections One of the highest forms of learning is synthesis: the ability to take two separate ideas and combine them to create something new. In this course, synthesis means looking back at what you learned in previous lessons and finding "bridges" to your current research. When you write a question that requires knowledge of two different time periods or topics to answer, you are demonstrating a deep, holistic understanding of the course material. This objective encourages you to see history as a continuous narrative rather than a series of disconnected dates.
Communication: Concise and Effective Writing Effective communication is the ability to convey complex ideas in a way that is easy for others to understand. This assignment challenges you to be brief but powerful. Every part of your submission, from the question itself to the three decoy answers, must be written with precision. You are learning how to pack significant historical information into a small space, ensuring that your peers can understand the challenge of the question without being confused by "fluff" or "filler" words.
Creating a high-quality question is a creative challenge. You aren't just looking for a "gotcha" moment; you are designing a small learning tool that helps others think. Use the guidelines below to ensure your work meets the "Thinking Deeper" criteria.
A "good" question for this course is one that cannot be answered by a quick search for a single fact. We want to avoid Direct Questions: these are "copy-paste" questions like "What year did the treaty get signed?" or "Who was the Prime Minister in 1914?" While these are facts, they don’t require much thinking.
Instead, aim for Indirect Questions. An indirect question requires the reader to "put two and two together." For example, instead of asking what a specific law was, you might ask how that law changed the daily lives of a specific group of people. The best questions often use Synthesis: they bridge today’s research with something you learned earlier in the week, asking how one event influenced or changed the other.
The "multiple choice" part of the assignment is often where the most learning happens. You need to provide one correct answer and three decoys.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
1 Quiz Question for every “day” of the course
We are learning to:
Communicate a question concisely
“think deeper” about the topics you investigate
Draw conclusions from available evidence
I can:
Formulate questions that guide research effectively
Analyze evidence effectively
Synthesize research into effective questions
Communicate important information in all parts of the question
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinking / Inquiring | Student formulates questions which very effectively guide their research | Student formulates questions which effectively guide their research | Student formulates questions which often guides their research effectively | Student formulates questions which sometimes guides their research effectively |
| Application (Analysis) | Student very effectively analyses evidence | Student effectively analyses evidence | Student often analyses evidence effectively | Student sometimes analyses evidence effectively |
| Application (Synthesis) | Student is able to synthesize their research into very effective questions | Student is able to synthesize their research into effective questions | Student is often able to synthesize their research into effective questions | Student is sometimes able to synthesize their research into effective questions |
| Communication | Student is able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question exceptionally well | Student is able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question | Student is often able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question | Student is sometimes able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question |
Student formulates questions which very effectively guide their research
Student formulates questions which effectively guide their research
Student formulates questions which often guides their research effectively
Student formulates questions which sometimes guides their research effectively
Student very effectively analyses evidence
Student effectively analyses evidence
Student often analyses evidence effectively
Student sometimes analyses evidence effectively
Student is able to synthesize their research into very effective questions
Student is able to synthesize their research into effective questions
Student is often able to synthesize their research into effective questions
Student is sometimes able to synthesize their research into effective questions
Student is able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question exceptionally well
Student is able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question
Student is often able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question
Student is sometimes able to communicate important information in all parts of the the question