"Biography is not a science. It is a creative art... The biographer is not a photographer, but a portrait painter."
Virginia WoolfHaving spent the last few weeks reading your chosen biography or autobiography, you have accumulated a deep knowledge of your subject's life. But you have also observed how that life was told.
Now, you will synthesize your observations into a Self-Debate. You will tackle the core question of this unit from two opposing perspectives: Is biography a form of fiction?
To construct a strong debate, you must first deeply understand the main intellectual arguments on both sides. Your job is not to choose one side and ignore the other, but to build the most persuasive, well-supported arguments possible for both perspectives.
This school of thought argues that biography belongs strictly in the realm of factual history:
This school of thought argues that the act of writing a life makes it a work of literary construction:
An annotated bibliography is a list of formal citations to your sources. Underneath each citation, you will write a brief paragraph (about 100 to 150 words) called an annotation.
For this assignment, your annotations must do three things:
Your bibliography must include:
The most convenient way to get a formatted bibliography entry these days is to just ask Gemini to do it for you: "Please respond with the data for this book in MLA format. [your book data]"
Here is how your Google Doc entries should be formatted:
Woolf, Virginia. Orlando: A Biography. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1928.
This modernist novel, framed as a biography of a nobleman who lives for centuries and changes gender, serves as Woolf's critique of traditional Victorian biography. By parodying the conventions of life-writing (such as chronological cataloging and obsession with documentary evidence), Woolf demonstrates how the biographer is forced to use creative imagination to capture the true essence of a subject. This source will serve as critical theoretical support for Side B of my debate. I will quote Woolf's satirical narration to argue that biography is inherently a crafted, creative art form rather than a simple collection of facts.
You are encouraged to use Gemini to help generate debate points, outline arguments, and brainstorm potential angles for both Side A and Side B. However, remember that AI is a brainstorming partner, not a researcher. You must support any ideas or arguments generated by finding reliable, verifiable evidence in your primary text (the biography) and secondary sources.
Deliverables:
Submit your Google Doc containing MLA-formatted citations and annotations for your primary and secondary sources.
Instead of a traditional essay, you will plan and deliver a two-part self-debate. Your goal is to make the absolute strongest case possible for both sides of the argument, using the biography or autobiography you read during this unit as your primary case study, and then film a video for each perspective.
In each video, you must argue passionately and persuasively for that specific side, representing its viewpoints as if they are absolute truth. You don't have to hold back: feel free to act like a person who cares way too much about biographies.
Your debate videos should address:
Since you are playing both sides of the debate, you'll need to use some creative filming and editing techniques to make the transition between "Debater A" and "Debater B" seamless and engaging:
Deliverables:
Submit your two 2-3 minute debate videos (Side A and Side B) presenting your opposing arguments.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
Annotated Bibliography (Google Doc) containing MLA-formatted references and brief annotations explaining how each source supports your arguments for Side A and/or Side B.
Video Debate: Side A - Biography as Non-Fiction (2 to 3 minutes) arguing passionately and persuasively that biography is an objective, factual record.
Video Debate: Side B - Biography as Fiction (2 to 3 minutes) arguing passionately and persuasively that biography is a crafted, literary fiction.
We are learning to:
Analyze a biography or autobiography from opposing critical perspectives, building the strongest possible arguments for both sides
Synthesize evidence from a full-length biography/autobiography to analyze the role of narrative selection, source gaps, and authorial perspective
Deliver persuasive, passionate oral arguments that utilize voice, tone, and rhetorical devices to defend contrasting viewpoints
I can:
Formulate compelling arguments and counterarguments for both sides of the "is biography fiction?" debate
Analyze how the author's selective choices and source gaps affect the objective truth of the text
Structure an MLA-formatted annotated bibliography that compiles and evaluates your primary and secondary sources
Cite examples and direct quotes from the chosen biography using MLA format to ground the debate points
Communicate with passion, clarity, and strong oral presentation skills in two distinct, opposing debate videos
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge / Understanding
How well does the student demonstrate understanding of biography conventions, subjectivity, and debate structure?
|
Demonstrates a thorough and nuanced understanding of biography conventions and debate structure | Demonstrates a considerable understanding of biography conventions and debate structure | Demonstrates some understanding of biography conventions and debate structure | Demonstrates limited understanding of biography conventions and debate structure |
|
Thinking / Inquiry
How effectively does the student construct compelling, balanced arguments on both sides of the debate, using textual evidence to evaluate life writing?
|
Constructs highly sophisticated arguments for both sides and performs a deep, critical analysis of narrative structure and evidence | Constructs clear, balanced arguments for both sides and performs a detailed analysis of narrative structure and evidence | Constructs general arguments for both sides and performs a basic analysis of narrative structure and evidence | Constructs weak or unbalanced arguments for both sides and performs a limited analysis with minimal depth |
|
Application
How effectively does the student apply their read biography as a case study to support claims on both sides of the debate?
|
Applies evidence from the read biography with a high degree of effectiveness to support all key arguments on both sides | Applies evidence from the read biography with considerable effectiveness to support key arguments on both sides | Applies evidence from the read biography with some effectiveness to support arguments on both sides | Applies evidence from the read biography with limited effectiveness |
|
Communication
How clearly, persuasively, and passionately does the student deliver their oral arguments in both videos, and how well is their written prep outline organized?
|
Delivers exceptionally clear, persuasive, and passionate oral arguments, and maintains a highly organized and polished prep outline | Delivers clear and persuasive oral arguments, and maintains a well-organized prep outline | Delivers oral arguments with some clarity and persuasiveness, and maintains a basic prep outline | Delivers oral arguments with limited clarity or persuasiveness, and maintains an unorganized or incomplete prep outline |
Demonstrates a thorough and nuanced understanding of biography conventions and debate structure
Demonstrates a considerable understanding of biography conventions and debate structure
Demonstrates some understanding of biography conventions and debate structure
Demonstrates limited understanding of biography conventions and debate structure
Constructs highly sophisticated arguments for both sides and performs a deep, critical analysis of narrative structure and evidence
Constructs clear, balanced arguments for both sides and performs a detailed analysis of narrative structure and evidence
Constructs general arguments for both sides and performs a basic analysis of narrative structure and evidence
Constructs weak or unbalanced arguments for both sides and performs a limited analysis with minimal depth
Applies evidence from the read biography with a high degree of effectiveness to support all key arguments on both sides
Applies evidence from the read biography with considerable effectiveness to support key arguments on both sides
Applies evidence from the read biography with some effectiveness to support arguments on both sides
Applies evidence from the read biography with limited effectiveness
Delivers exceptionally clear, persuasive, and passionate oral arguments, and maintains a highly organized and polished prep outline
Delivers clear and persuasive oral arguments, and maintains a well-organized prep outline
Delivers oral arguments with some clarity and persuasiveness, and maintains a basic prep outline
Delivers oral arguments with limited clarity or persuasiveness, and maintains an unorganized or incomplete prep outline